We previously discussed the effects of daily compounding and stated that when it comes to leveraged single-stock ETPs, “the trend is your friend.”
However, some investors might have a hard time deciding between the two leverage factors, namely 2X and 3X. When in doubt, go big (i.e. 3X) or stay moderate (i.e. 2X)? Well, it all depends. This article will take apart what it means to have a “trend” and how deeply it affects an investor’s portfolio value with regard to the two leverage factors we offer. We will use product performance data of two crowd-favourites: the 2X Tesla ETP (TSL2) and the 3X Tesla ETP* (TSL3) against the performance of their underlying stock, Tesla (TSLA).*The data for the 3X ETP is simulated and based on backtested values since it was listed on March 17, 2021
The Case for 3X
Let’s “invest” into three products on the 29th of December 2020: TSLA, TSL2 and TSL3. Over the next 8 trading days, TSLA skyrockets over 32% in value, with not a single day of a “slide back”.
As this case demonstrates:
“If the underlying ends up climbing day-on-day, a higher leverage factor is a better bet to make than a lower leverage factor”
But hindsight is always 20-20. When this is not the case, making a choice gets a little more complex.
The Case for 2X
Let’s “invest” into three products on the 29th of July 2020: TSLA, TSL2 and TSL3. Over the next 11 trading days, TSLA has a modest (by its standards) climb of 3.7%. However, between these days, TSLA’s trajectory is anything but modest:
Until the 11th, the value of a 2X investment is clearly visible: the 3X doesn’t really recover lost ground after the 15% drop in value by the 31st, while the 2X crawled closer to the underlying after the 31st until the 11th. The 13% spike on the 12th enabled the 3X to draw up par with the 2X.
Let’s consider another more recent case of a similar nature to further exemplify this behaviour.
Let’s “invest” into three products on the 4th of March 2021: TSLA, TSL2 and TSL3. Over the next 5 trading days, TSLA climbs up 7.5%. However, between these days, TSLA’s trajectory is – like in the previous case – rather dramatic:
Like in the previous scenario, the value of the 2X investment is clearly visible: while the 3X had lost nearly 27% of its value by the 8th, the 2X and the underlying and the 2X had lost 9.4% and 18.4% respectively. In fact, the drop is so profound that even the single-day 20% increase in the underlying only gives the 3X a 2.5% edge in gains over the 2X, which now has a net gain of almost 14%.
Examining the behaviour of the 3X and 2X over these scenarios, the argument on the choice between the 2X and 3X can be summarized thus:
“When it comes to choppy markets, a lower leverage factor has a significantly less pronounced value decay than a higher leverage factor”
It also bears noting in the choppy market scenarios in the case made for 2X, there was one single day where the underlying has a massive snap back in value. This illustrates the damaging effects of “value decay”: the 3X just about draw par to the 2X after several days of a loss in value that was greater than that seen in the 2X.
In that regard, the 2X investment was, in fact, the better choice to make a leveraged bet simply because it lost less value than the 3X and ended up par with the 3X after the recovery.
The seasoned investor would know that dramatic snap back in value is certainly not strange for Tesla but it’s relatively less pronounced for most other ‘mature’ stocks on days other than those immediately following an earnings call or major news. However, “choppy market” scenarios are a common feature to almost every stock.
Leveraged investments are risky plays, generally short-term investments and require active management. Ultimately, it is up to the investor to make a judgement call on what sort of days are up ahead with their investment and make a leveraged play.
Investors should review our full list of product offerings to determine the kind of factor play that would best serve their portfolios and subscribe to our mailing list to keep abreast of new developments as we continue to bring more disruptive products to market.
Violeta è entrata a far parte di Leverage Shares nel settembre 2022. È responsabile dello svolgimento di analisi tecniche e ricerche macroeconomiche ed azionarie, fornendo pregiate informazioni per aiutare a definire le strategie di investimento per i clienti.
Prima di cominciare con LS, Violeta ha lavorato presso diverse società di investimento di alto profilo in Australia, come Tollhurst e Morgans Financial, dove ha trascorso gli ultimi 12 anni della sua carriera.
Violeta è un tecnico di mercato certificato dall’Australian Technical Analysts Association e ha conseguito un diploma post-laurea in finanza applicata e investimenti presso Kaplan Professional (FINSIA), Australia, dove è stata docente per diversi anni.
Julian è entrato a far parte di Leverage Shares nel 2018 come parte della prima espansione della società in Europa orientale. È responsabile della progettazione di strategie di marketing e della promozione della notorietà del marchio.
Oktay è entrato a far parte di Leverage Shares alla fine del 2019. È responsabile della crescita aziendale, mantenendo relazioni chiave e sviluppando attività di vendita nei mercati di lingua inglese.
È entrato in LS da UniCredit, dove è stato responsabile delle relazioni aziendali per le multinazionali. La sua precedente esperienza è in finanza aziendale e amministrazione di fondi in società come IBM Bulgaria e DeGiro / FundShare.
Oktay ha conseguito una laurea in Finanza e contabilità ed un certificato post-laurea in Imprenditoria presso il Babson College. Ha ottenuto anche la certificazione CFA.