As per the New York Federal Reserve’s Center for Microeconomic Data, Q2 saw US household debt rise above $16 trillion in Q2 2022. Of the debt components, mortgage, auto loan, and credit card balances saw an increase over the past quarter while student loan balances remained largely unchanged.
Over the long run, student loan balances have seen a steady increase over the years in the total mix of debt balances.
As per the US Federal Reserve, the total amount of outstanding student-loan debt in the U.S. is around $1.75 trillion, of which 92% – around $1.6 trillion — is held by the government. This works out to about 6.5% of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP). Student debt, as a whole, has grown nearly threefold since the 2008 Financial Crisis.
However, this threefold increase in student debt isn’t really supported by a threefold increase in college graduates. Long-term trends suggest that there has only been a 8-9% increase in college graduation since 2007/2008.
As it turns out, after hospital services, college education has seen the largest increase in price over the past two decades.
This explains the growing historical share of college debt in US household debt. As per the non-profit Education Data Initiative, which pools data from academic and public sources, there are 43.4 million borrowers with federal student-loan debt.
The ballooning college debt isn’t just a “young person’s problem”. Debtors aged 50-61 held the third-largest pool of college debt and owed the largest average amount across all other age categories.
As the New York Federal Reserve noted, mortgage balances showed the biggest quarter-by-quarter increases within the total basket of household debt. The rising mortgage prices do have a correlated effect with the Federal Reserve’s rate hikes but housing prices also play a part in denominating the principal owed. Over the course of the Year Till Date (YTD), median home sale prices have been trending down due to reduced demand.
Interestingly, as a percentage of GDP, total household debt is estimated to be trending downwards since the highs seen during the height of movement restrictions and lockdowns during the pandemic.
Despite rising mortgages and student debt (where interest accumulates daily, unlike credit cards and mortgages), rates of serious delinquency are at historical lows, with the Federal Reserve warning that this masks “potential distress”.
As last week’s article stated, the economy is a multi-factor interlocking network of inputs and outputs. In an article written almost exactly a month ago, data showed low-income areas and population segments experiencing a surge in loan defaults. Now, mid- to higher-income population segments are more likely to enter college. These segments are showing a tendency to pay down and “rationalize” their debts. In other words, the “higher income” college graduate population segment is increasingly more geared towards paying debt than building equity while “lower income” population segment is being priced out of building equity with loan defaults and resultant economic costs. Despite different routes travelled by denizens on either end of a widening wealth gap, the result is largely the same: a reduced tendency to partake in high-priced goods and services across the board.
Thus, while the purchase of goods and services is a fundamental driver of the economy, neither the “working class” nor the “middle class” show a forward-looking tendency to be able to sustain this practice. This doesn’t bode well for the US economy in the near- to mid-term, at least.
Interestingly, as a percentage of nominal GDP, total household debt is estimated to trending downwards since the highs seen during the period when lockdowns and movement restrictions were in place.
Given the high cost of mortgage and college debt, it’s a fair bet that this implies that there was reduced participation and inclusion in both these categories of economic activity. A number of other countries show a markedly higher household debt to GDP ratios.
Among “Western” countries, Australia, Canada and Sweden show much higher ratios while South Korea, Hong Kong and Japan do the same among “Eastern” countries. With regard to “Eastern” countries, China draws up about par with the U.S. in the 62-64 range while India is the least burdened by debt is in the 14-18 range.
On the 24th of August, US President Joe Biden announced a plan to staunch the drain on personal incomes due to ballooning student loans. There are three broad provisions:
Student debt forgiveness of up to $10,000 per borrower—and up to $20k per borrower in many cases—among households with income up to $250,000;
A continuation of the pause on current student loan payments through year-end, after which payments will resume;
An income-driven repayment plan that would cap monthly payments to 5% of a borrower’s discretionary income (from 10% under an existing program)
As per the Penn Wharton Budget Model, a group of economists and data scientists at the University of Pennsylvania who analyze public policy to assess its economic and fiscal impact, the total cost of “forgiving” that debt could mount to $519 billion over the prospective 10-year horizon.
If all borrowers eligible for the program enroll, student loan balances would reduce by around $400 billion, or 1.6% of GDP. This is more or less in line with the Penn Wharton Budget Model’s findings. Of course, historically, no federal assistance program has ever had full enrollment.
While lower-income households will see the largest proportional cut in debt payments, most of them don’t have student debt. Middle-income households will benefit the most but the sum effect is only $10,000.
Loan payments will fall from 0.4% of personal income to 0.3%.Goldman Sachs estimates only a 0.1% point boost to the GDP in 2023 with smaller effects in subsequent years.
While “debt forgiveness” with lower monthly payments is slightly inflationary in isolation, the resumption of payments is likely to more than offset this.
The cut in the size of many borrowers’ monthly payments when they resume in January would increase household disposable income while increasing the federal deficit. For instance,When payments resume in January, payments will increase by around $35 billion on an annualized basis instead of $55 billion.
The sum total of effects would lead to the deficit increasing by roughly $400 billion over the next two years. However, since the government has already funded those loans from its coffers, there will be no substantial impact on Treasury issuances.
As of at the time of writing, the US market is being tested for new lows. Ed Clissold, chief U.S. strategist at Ned Davis Research mentions in his note dated August 31: “Recession fears are the most likely trigger of a retest of the June lows. From a seasonality perspective, a retest could come in the next several weeks.” Vanguard Group reported on September 1 that it’s downgrading its forecast for U.S. economic growth for this year after two straight quarters of contraction. The firm now expects economic growth between 0.25% and -0.75% for 2022, down from its estimate last month of about 1.5%.
The modest boost in personal savings seemingly promised via the US Student Loan relief measures wouldn’t be enough to turn this sentiment around. The fundamental problem with the US college debt situation is the cost of education and not the debt availed. If the former wasn’t so high, the latter wouldn’t be an issue. While the proposed measures do bring some relief to a large number of people, said relief is quite limited. The fundamental problem continues to receive no reprieve in the compromise-driven corridors of power in Washington DC.
Exchange-Traded Products (ETPs) offer substantial potential to gain magnified exposure with potential losses limited to only the invested amount and no further. Learn more about Exchange Traded Products providing exposure on either the upside or the downside to the S&P 500 as well as the upside or the downside to the Nasdaq-100.
Sandeep joined Leverage Shares in September 2020. He leads research on existing and new product lines, asset classes, and strategies, with special emphasis on analysis of recent events and developments.
Sandeep has longstanding experience with financial markets. Starting with a Chicago-based hedge fund as a financial engineer, his career has spanned a variety of domains and organizations over a course of 8 years – from Barclays Capital’s Prime Services Division to (most recently) Nasdaq’s Index Research Team.
Sandeep holds an M.S. in Finance as well as an MBA from Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago.
Violeta joined Leverage Shares in September 2022. She is responsible for conducting technical analysis, macro and equity research, providing valuable insights to help shape investment strategies for clients.
Prior to joining LS, Violeta worked at several high-profile investment firms in Australia, such as Tollhurst and Morgans Financial where she spent the past 12 years of her career.
Violeta is a certified market technician from the Australian Technical Analysts Association and holds a Post Graduate Diploma of Applied Finance and Investment from Kaplan Professional (FINSIA), Australia, where she was a lecturer for a number of years.
Julian joined Leverage Shares in 2018 as part of the company’s primary expansion in Eastern Europe. He is responsible for web content and raising brand awareness.
Julian has been academically involved with economics, psychology, sociology, European politics & linguistics. He has experience in business development and marketing through business ventures of his own.
For Julian, Leverage Shares is an innovator in the field of finance & fintech, and he always looks forward with excitement to share the next big news with investors in the UK & Europe.
Oktay joined Leverage Shares in late 2019. He is responsible for driving business growth by maintaining key relationships and developing sales activity across English-speaking markets.
He joined Leverage Shares from UniCredit, where he was a corporate relationship manager for multinationals. His previous experience is in corporate finance and fund administration at firms like IBM Bulgaria and DeGiro / FundShare.
Oktay holds a BA in Finance & Accounting and a post-graduate certificate in Entrepreneurship from Babson College. He is also a CFA charterholder.
Terms and Conditions
If you are not classified as an institutional investor, you will be categorised as a private/retail investor. At this time, we cannot send communications directly to private/retail investors. You are welcome to view the contents of this website.
If you are an ‘Institutional investor’, you affirm either that you are a Per Se Professional Client, or that you wish to be treated as an Eligible Counterparty Client, both as defined under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, or an equivalent in a jurisdiction outside the European Economic Area.
The value of an investment in ETPs may go down as well as up and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Trading in ETPs may not be suitable for all types of investor as they carry a high degree of risk. You may lose all of your initial investment. Only speculate with money you can afford to lose. Changes in exchange rates may also cause your investment to go up or down in value. Tax laws may be subject to change. Please ensure that you fully understand the risks involved. If in any doubt, please seek independent financial advice. Investors should refer to the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the relevant prospectus for further details of these and other risks associated with an investment in the securities offered by the Issuer.
This website is provided for your general information only and does not constitute investment advice or an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any investment.
Nothing on this website is advice on the merits of any product or investment, nothing constitutes investment, legal, tax or any other advice nor is it to be relied on in making an investment decision. Prospective investors should obtain independent investment advice and inform themselves as to applicable legal requirements, exchange control regulations and taxes in their jurisdiction.
This website complies with the regulatory requirements of the United Kingdom. There may be laws in your country of nationality or residence or in the country from which you access this website which restrict the extent to which the website may be made available to you.
United States Visitors
The information provided on this site is not directed to any United States person or any person in the United States, any state thereof, or any of its territories or possessions.
Persons accessing this website in the European Economic Area
Access to this site is restricted to Non-U.S. Persons outside the United States within the meaning of Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Each person accessing this site, by so doing, acknowledges that: (1) it is not a U.S. person (within the meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act) and is located outside the U.S. (within the meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act); and (2) any securities described herein (A) have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act or with any securities regulatory authority of any state or other jurisdiction and (B) may not be offered, sold, pledged or otherwise transferred except to persons outside the U.S. in accordance with Regulation S under the Securities Act pursuant to the terms of such securities. None of the funds on this website are registered under the United States Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”).
Exclusion of Liability
Certain documents made available on the website have been prepared and issued by persons other than Leverage Shares Management Company. This includes any Prospectus document. Leverage Shares Management Company is not responsible in any way for the content of any such document. Except in those cases, the information on the website has been given in good faith and every effort has been made to ensure its accuracy. Nevertheless, Leverage Shares Management Company shall not be responsible for loss occasioned as a result of reliance placed on any part of the website and it makes no guarantee as to the accuracy of any information or content on the website. The description of any ETP Security referred to in this website is a general one. The terms and conditions applicable to investors will be set out in the Prospectus, available on the website and should be read prior to making any investment.
Leverage Shares exchange-traded products (ETPs) provide leveraged exposure and are only suitable for experienced investors with knowledge of the risks and potential benefits of leveraged investment strategies.
This website is maintained by Leverage Shares Management Company, which is a limited liability company and is incorporated in Ireland with registered offices at 2 Grand Canal Square, Grand Canal Harbour, Dublin 2.
By clicking you agree to the Terms and Conditions displayed.