Over the course of the past week, NVIDIA Inc (NASDAQ: NVDA) has seen significant performance. Over the course of the week, however, NVIDIA was not the only one raising market momentum in the tech-heavy Nasdaq-100.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc (NASDAQ: AMD) followed closely behind NVIDIA while diminutive Marvell Technology (NASDAQ: MRVL) showed the greatest rise. In fact, its 41% return in the past week ensured that its shareholders accrued a staggering 208% gain over a five-year window.
Interestingly, these same names – along with a few other “AI-adjacent” tickers – rounded out the net effect to generate a nearly identical momentum in the broad-market S&P 500.
Even the Russell 2000 – comprising of small cap stocks – shows the same effect, albeit at a vastly attenuated net momentum contribution. Diminutive C3.ai Inc (NASDAQ: AI) and Super Micro Computer Inc (NASDAQ: SMCI) showed a vast rally to close the hemorrhaging small-cap segment with a minute net positive momentum of 0.19% among its Top 25 momentum contributors.
What is telling, however, is that the rest of the market – both broad and tech-heavy – has been showing a growing cumulative slump in the Year Till Date (YTD). As per Bank of America late last week, all of seven Big Tech stocks were up 70% in equal-weighted terms as compared to the other 493 stocks in S&P 500, which was up only 0.1%.
The bank also makes an interesting distinction: cumulative inflows over the last 15 years indicate no large-scale sustained deviations between being invested in specific names over the broad market until around 2019. From this point forward, inflows began to diverge largely in favour of specific names.
The bearishness in the market does have some macroeconomic backing: contrary to proclamations of relief every other month in relaxations of CPI year-on-year increases across many financial media publications, there has been no sustained pivot in core inflation trends for almost 13 years now across the Western Hemisphere (and Japan).
In fact, since 2021, there has been a 14% increase in the US’ core CPI alone.
This somewhat explicates why, in net terms, lower unit sales translates to higher dollar revenues: as goods and services get more and more expensive, one can sell fewer goods/services to make the same amount in unadjusted dollar terms. Even when the market beats already-depressed earnings estimates, this continues to signify fewer sales in unit terms.
There’s a hint of this effect even in exports from China to the U.S. and the rest of the world.
While there is a slight uptick in the rest of the world (predominantly in the Western Hemisphere (and even Latin America), exports to the world’s largest consumer – the U.S. – show a declining trend. This trend remains sustained despite the Chinese renminbi effectively being pegged lower in recent times to make it cheaper relative to the U.S. dollar.
This brings up the question: why has Big Tech in general (and AI in particular more recently) been receiving so much capital commitment in the market lately? This is due to a phenomenon that could broadly be classified as the “Treasury Stock Effect”. Essentially, certain companies are being assumed to irreplaceable over the mid- to long-term (i.e. “at least for now”), which has led to a concentration of convictions in Big Tech. The recent rising conviction in AI stocks is essentially driven by a conviction that AI would be the cornerstone for reducing costly human activities by substituting them with lines of “smart code”.
It isn’t the first time such a perception has manifested. Over the last one thousand years, every point of inflection (or “technological disruption”) – from the printing press to the polio vaccine – had created a bubble in the world of commerce.
The result of every bubble has been the same: inevitably, most bubbles collapse and many of the companies with the loftily-valued stocks chug on in the new normal.
The closest parallel to a world-changing paradigm that most in the present day can relate to would be the dot-com era in the late nineties to the early noughties, which laid the groundwork for the importance of Big Tech to American commerce. Scott McNealy, CEO of Sun Microsystems – a darling of the dot-com bubble era – had this to say in an interview with Bloomberg in 2002 over the implications of the lofty Price-to-Sales Ratio of 10X that his company’s stock had once risen to:
“At 10 times revenues, to give you a 10-year payback, I have to pay you 100% of revenues for 10 straight years in dividends. That assumes I can get that by my shareholders. That assumes I have zero cost of goods sold, which is very hard for a computer company. That assumes zero expenses, which is really hard with 39,000 employees. That assumes I pay no taxes, which is very hard. And that assumes you pay no taxes on your dividends, which is kind of illegal. And that assumes with zero R&D for the next 10 years, I can maintain the current revenue run rate. Now, having done that, would any of you like to buy my stock at $64? Do you realize how ridiculous those basic assumptions are? You don’t need any transparency. You don’t need any footnotes. What were you thinking?”
Mr. McNealy’s exclamation was in response to the lofty valuations bestowed on his company. 10.7 was the highest Price-to-Sales (PS) Ratio it ever had. After that, the company’s stock waned away until Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems in 2009-10.
Incidentally, Oracle is currently trading around the 6-7X PS Ratio range. AMD’s is almost 9 while NVIDIA’s is almost 38.
Much like many buzzwords before, “AI” is turning into a shibboleth that many investors are implying would mean dizzying results when the empirical reality is that, all too often, the transformation would neither be contained to nor remain with a few names. Furthermore, the rate of transformation would by no means be as comprehensive or total: the printing press didn’t entirely supplant the written word, the polio vaccine didn’t mean freedom from all disease, the telegraph didn’t become the be-all, end-all to communications until its eventual demise, and the Man on the Moon didn’t translate to giant space cities all over the Solar System (or, at least not yet).
So, what becomes of the bubble? In realistic terms, the first to exit tend to be the largest net winner while the last to remain holding tend to be the net loser. Such is the market; it seldom remains irrational (or, for that matter, rational) for too long. Overall, most market indicators are heading steadily into the “Bearish” range.
All in all, “caveat emptor”. However, for sophisticated investors looking to make tactical plays on either side of the market’s latest trajectory, there are a host of Exchange Traded Products (ETPs) available. NVIDIA has an ETP for the upside as well as the downside. AMD too has an ETP for the upside and the downside. For investors looking to stay invested in Big Tech, the newly-launched FAANG+ ETP provides an equally-weighted exposure to the 10 biggest names in tech.
Sandeep joined Leverage Shares in September 2020. He leads research on existing and new product lines, asset classes, and strategies, with special emphasis on analysis of recent events and developments.
Sandeep has longstanding experience with financial markets. Starting with a Chicago-based hedge fund as a financial engineer, his career has spanned a variety of domains and organizations over a course of 8 years – from Barclays Capital’s Prime Services Division to (most recently) Nasdaq’s Index Research Team.
Sandeep holds an M.S. in Finance as well as an MBA from Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago.
Julian joined Leverage Shares in 2018 as part of the company’s primary expansion in Eastern Europe. He is responsible for web content and raising brand awareness.
Julian has been academically involved with economics, psychology, sociology, European politics & linguistics. He has experience in business development and marketing through business ventures of his own.
For Julian, Leverage Shares is an innovator in the field of finance & fintech, and he always looks forward with excitement to share the next big news with investors in the UK & Europe.
Violeta joined Leverage Shares in September 2022. She is responsible for conducting technical analysis, macro and equity research, providing valuable insights to help shape investment strategies for clients.
Prior to joining LS, Violeta worked at several high-profile investment firms in Australia, such as Tollhurst and Morgans Financial where she spent the past 12 years of her career.
Violeta is a certified market technician from the Australian Technical Analysts Association and holds a Post Graduate Diploma of Applied Finance and Investment from Kaplan Professional (FINSIA), Australia, where she was a lecturer for a number of years.
Oktay joined Leverage Shares in late 2019. He is responsible for driving business growth by maintaining key relationships and developing sales activity across English-speaking markets.
He joined Leverage Shares from UniCredit, where he was a corporate relationship manager for multinationals. His previous experience is in corporate finance and fund administration at firms like IBM Bulgaria and DeGiro / FundShare.
Oktay holds a BA in Finance & Accounting and a post-graduate certificate in Entrepreneurship from Babson College. He is also a CFA charterholder.
Terms and Conditions
If you are not classified as an institutional investor, you will be categorised as a private/retail investor. At this time, we cannot send communications directly to private/retail investors. You are welcome to view the contents of this website.
If you are an ‘Institutional investor’, you affirm either that you are a Per Se Professional Client, or that you wish to be treated as an Eligible Counterparty Client, both as defined under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, or an equivalent in a jurisdiction outside the European Economic Area.
The value of an investment in ETPs may go down as well as up and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Trading in ETPs may not be suitable for all types of investor as they carry a high degree of risk. You may lose all of your initial investment. Only speculate with money you can afford to lose. Changes in exchange rates may also cause your investment to go up or down in value. Tax laws may be subject to change. Please ensure that you fully understand the risks involved. If in any doubt, please seek independent financial advice. Investors should refer to the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the relevant prospectus for further details of these and other risks associated with an investment in the securities offered by the Issuer.
This website is provided for your general information only and does not constitute investment advice or an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any investment.
Nothing on this website is advice on the merits of any product or investment, nothing constitutes investment, legal, tax or any other advice nor is it to be relied on in making an investment decision. Prospective investors should obtain independent investment advice and inform themselves as to applicable legal requirements, exchange control regulations and taxes in their jurisdiction.
This website complies with the regulatory requirements of the United Kingdom. There may be laws in your country of nationality or residence or in the country from which you access this website which restrict the extent to which the website may be made available to you.
United States Visitors
The information provided on this site is not directed to any United States person or any person in the United States, any state thereof, or any of its territories or possessions.
Persons accessing this website in the European Economic Area
Access to this site is restricted to Non-U.S. Persons outside the United States within the meaning of Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Each person accessing this site, by so doing, acknowledges that: (1) it is not a U.S. person (within the meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act) and is located outside the U.S. (within the meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act); and (2) any securities described herein (A) have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act or with any securities regulatory authority of any state or other jurisdiction and (B) may not be offered, sold, pledged or otherwise transferred except to persons outside the U.S. in accordance with Regulation S under the Securities Act pursuant to the terms of such securities. None of the funds on this website are registered under the United States Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”).
Exclusion of Liability
Certain documents made available on the website have been prepared and issued by persons other than Leverage Shares Management Company. This includes any Prospectus document. Leverage Shares Management Company is not responsible in any way for the content of any such document. Except in those cases, the information on the website has been given in good faith and every effort has been made to ensure its accuracy. Nevertheless, Leverage Shares Management Company shall not be responsible for loss occasioned as a result of reliance placed on any part of the website and it makes no guarantee as to the accuracy of any information or content on the website. The description of any ETP Security referred to in this website is a general one. The terms and conditions applicable to investors will be set out in the Prospectus, available on the website and should be read prior to making any investment.
Leverage Shares exchange-traded products (ETPs) provide leveraged exposure and are only suitable for experienced investors with knowledge of the risks and potential benefits of leveraged investment strategies.
This website is maintained by Leverage Shares Management Company, which is a limited liability company and is incorporated in Ireland with registered offices at 2 Grand Canal Square, Grand Canal Harbour, Dublin 2.
By clicking you agree to the Terms and Conditions displayed.