fbpx

Why Are Chinese Markets Falling?

The financial media is replete with news about a $1.5 trillion selloff in Chinese stocks in recent times. Goldman Sachs, at the end of July, cited “disproportionately high index representation by tech and privately owned companies” for lowering its views on the MSCI China index. Commentators cited Beijing’s crackdown on Chinese tech companies as a significant factor.

This article will seek to give context for what’s happening with Chinese markets.

 

Root Causes

At the outset, it seems necessary to note that most companies popular with Western investors had no unannounced risk factors as Q2 2021 rolled in. While markets did slow down globally in Q3 2021, the degree of slowdown was nowhere close to such a large selloff. The root cause of it lies within China itself.

Late in October last year, Alibaba founder Jack Ma addressed the Bund Finance Summit in Shanghai as a keynote speaker. Serving as a backdrop to the then-upcoming IPO for his fintech offering Ant Group, Mr. Ma called Chinese regulators an “old boys club” fearful of new ideas and the Chinese banking system as having a “pawnshop mentality”. He went on to pitch the virtues of a digital currency as a solution to future problems and one that can be free of outdated constraints.

Within a week, the Ant Group IPO was suspended and new rules were drafted for regulating internet platforms. Within a month, the Politburo resolved to strengthen antitrust efforts and a probe was launched into Alibaba. Subsequently, a number of companies – predominantly tech – were investigated, prompting many to attribute Mr. Ma’s speech as being the genesis of the crackdown.

It bears noting that Mr. Ma’s speech was not the origin of the crackdown. As early as two years prior to his speech, regulators had been calling for action to address a number of problems: growing “moral corruption” among the youth, increasing familial financial burdens, the brutal work schedule in new companies, and so forth. A key factor underpinning these problems – as per the State – was the ongoing change in “culture”.

When Chairman Deng Xiaoping engineered the liberalization of the Chinese economy 40 years ago – effectively transitioning from a command economy to a mixed-mode economy and permanently cementing the “Sino-Soviet split” – Chinese graduates began to troop into top Western universities and companies. When many of these graduates eventually (and inevitably) went on to build companies, their focus was on the vast untapped Chinese market. With a distinct local advantage and starting out as clones of top Western companies, these companies continually evolved into every niche that the Chinese populace was looking to consume and engendered powerful economic change.

One attribute these companies’ founders imbibed from Western companies was competitiveness – employees worked longer, harder and for far greater reward than they would have within a State-owned enterprise while company management sometimes – possibly/allegedly – didn’t hesitate to take shortcuts to get to the top.

This idea of simply cloning Western ideas for the domestic market was also criticized by Mr. Ma during his speech – which most Western media sources did not transcribe or present to their readers fully. In this regard, Mr. Ma echoed the sentiments of Chairman Deng who, in a conversation with socialist Ghanaian president Jerry Rawlings in 1985, said “Don’t just copy China’s model. You have to walk your own path”.

However, where Mr. Ma and Chairman Deng differ was that while Mr. Ma seemed to be reposing faith in the burgeoning Chinese private sector and its resourcefulness, Chairman Deng’s interest in economic liberalization was rooted in improving China’s economic problems. The country’s political destiny, as per the venerated Chairman, would and must lie with the Party. This idea is shared by current Party General Secretary – and possible President for life – Xi Jinping.

Actions taken on Mr. Ma after his speech had a transformative effect on the magnitude of the State’s punitive actions. Alibaba was fined ¥18.23 billion ($2.8 billion) by the regulators in April for abusing its dominant market position by forcing online merchants to open stores or take part in promotions on its platforms – almost 1% of the company’s market cap. Exclusive contracts tying online merchants to platforms became the root cause for regulators to investigate JD.com and rising rival Meituan – with the latter facing a roughly $1 billion fine.

JD.com, Meituan and several other internet companies are also being investigated by financial watchdogs for practices that include but not limited to irregularities in mergers and acquisitions – a long-valued means of growth in China.

Approval for new games was already problematic to regulators due to the effects of gaming addiction among minors long before Mr. Ma’s speech. Tencent lost $60 billion in market cap (almost 10%) on August 3 after Economic Information Daily – a State-run economics newspaper – called gaming “spiritual opium”, a very loaded term in China. (The article disappeared from the web soon after its effects were felt but reappeared later in the day without said term and some other edits. Tencent closed down 6.1% that day). Loudly-stated concerns by State mouthpieces and think tanks over ongoing “moral corruption” of youth have led to gaming companies, short video platforms and vaping firms feeling the heat from regulators and in the stock market as well.

Tencent was also told that its recently-acquired competitors in music streaming may have to be sold and that its exclusive contracts with music producers must be terminated due to antitrust issues.

Targeted hardest were online education companies – a key (and expensive) means of help for children with the Chinese curriculum. Ostensibly done to ease financial pressures on families that have led to low birth rates, these companies will be barred from raising money through listings or other capital-related activities and must reorganise as non-profits while other listed companies will be barred from investing in them. Duolingo, a popular language-learning app, disappeared from Chinese app stores. TikTok owner ByteDance closed its education division with immediate effect.

 

Market Effect and View

While the ongoing crackdown might give an impression that the Chinese economy is tanking, a closer view of the market would be in order. For this, we shall compare the performance of the Nasdaq Golden Dragon Index (HXC) and the S&P China A 50 Index (CSSP50) – indexes that tracks U.S.-listed Chinese companies and the top 50 best-performing China-listed companies respectively – versus the CSI300, CSI500 and CSI1000 – which track the large- , mid- and small-cap companies listed in mainland China’s state-run stock exchanges.

Over a trailing 1-year period, virtually all indices were either recovering from the pandemic or attaining giddy heights midway through Q2 2021 before State actions began in earnest. The hardest-hit were the U.S.-listed companies with the next lot being the top 50 China-listed companies, with nearly matching underperformance. However, drawing up par with their performance as of last year are the state-run exchanges’ indices.

This is a clear indicator of two facts:

  1. The hardest-hit companies were the “blue-eyed” investor favourite tech giants with aggressive growth trajectories in high-consumption “consumer” segments;

  2. The larger Chinese economy is far more diversified and relatively unaffected.

This underlines what Goldman Sachs had highlighted: “tech” companies are too large a component of China-centric investments while the broader economy had been chugging along quite reasonably, largely unnoticed by Western eyes, all this time. China’s crackdown is simultaneously a lesson for investors to broaden their focus beyond “tech” and a warning to the nouveau riche to not dream of being above the nation-state.

Interestingly, as per the reported Put/Call Ratio over the past year, the global trading community seem to have faith that at least some top Chinese companies have largely internalized the lessons learned.

Using “China’s Google” Baidu – which has not been seriously censured till date – as a baseline for comparison versus the recently-chastised Alibaba and the currently-being-chastised JD.com, it can be seen that Alibaba’s ratio indicates that the market expects the worst to have passed for Mr. Ma while JD.com’s fortunes are still being considered a little tenuous. Such a scenario can be seen being played out on almost all the listed companies under fire.

 

In Conclusion

Given their wealth and power, the global tech nouveau riche might be accustomed to a certain leeway and deference from the Western populace and its political class. This is a key difference between the West and the East: in the East, the nation-state is the supreme embodiment of an ancient “culture” older than Christ and Moses which radiates beyond mere lines on a map. And by no means will this type of crackdown be likely limited to China.

In May of last year, the Indian government tabled a bill in Parliament mandating the localisation and protection of all Indian citizens’ data collected and monetised by tech giants. Expected to become law later this year, China – which typically doesn’t require a specific law be in place for a regulator to take action – has already demanded the same of tech companies as well.

Under fire by Indian parliamentarians over the company’s repeated failure to remove inflammatory fake news under amended laws, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey stated that the company operates under its own rules. IT Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad replied that the laws of India are supreme in every case and that the country doesn’t need a lecture on freedom and democracy from the likes of Twitter. The company dilly-dallied to the brink of having its local management behind held personally responsible for spreading hate speech and the company’s expulsion before capitulating. All other tech giants – including Google and Facebook – had long affirmed their compliance by then. Antitrust actions by Indian regulators against the business practices of Amazon and Walmart-owned Flipkart – which were dismissed by U.S. Supreme Court – have been admitted by the Indian Supreme Court, despite these companies’ pleas, and legal proceedings are due to begin soon.

China and India hold a remarkably similar view in this case: the political class and teeming indigenous masses’ aspirations rank far higher than the supranational ambitions of a select few among the global tech nouveau riche – be they indigenous or not. Of course, how it works out for investors rests squarely on how deeply the principals that investors pin their fortunes on understand the ideas of “culture” and national boundaries, especially when it comes to these two behemoths representative of the East.

A shrewd investor can build a number of strategies on the Chinese market. Leverage Shares offers 3X ETPs on Baidu (3BID), Alibaba (3BAB) and JD.com (3JD), 2X ETPs on Alibaba (2BAB), along with Shorts (-1X) on Baidu (SBIU), Alibaba (SBAB) and JD.com (SJD). The company also offers 1X Trackers for Baidu (BIDU), JD.com (JD1X) and Pinduoduo (PDD).

Investors should also review Leverage Shares’ full list of short & leveraged ETPs as well as trackers to supplement their portfolios in other sectors and subscribe to the mailing list to stay abreast of new developments.

Post correlati

A quick study on the effects of market behaviour on the returns of a 3X ETP vs a 2X ETP.
A quick study on the effects of market behaviour on the returns of a 3X ETP vs a 2X ETP.

Buscar

Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Categories
Education ES
ETPs
featured es
In the press ES
insight ES
Market Insights ES
research ES
Uncategorized
WebsimES
Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Categories
Education ES
ETPs
featured es
In the press ES
insight ES
Market Insights ES
research ES
Uncategorized
WebsimES

Violeta Todorova

Senior Research

Violeta se unió a Leverage Shares en septiembre de 2022. Ella gestiona la realización de análisis técnicos, investigación macroeconómica y de acciones, y ofrece información valiosa que ayuda a la definición de estrategias de inversión para los clientes.

Antes de unirse a LS, Violeta trabajó en varias empresas de inversión de alto perfil en Australia, como Tollhurst y Morgans Financial, donde pasó los últimos 12 años de su carrera.

Violeta es una técnica de mercado certificada de la Asociación Australiana de Analistas Técnicos y tiene un Diploma de Postgrado en Finanzas e Inversiones Aplicadas de Kaplan Professional (FINSIA), Australia, donde fue profesora durante varios años.

Julian Manoilov

Senior Analyst
Julián se unió a Leverage Shares en 2018 como parte de la principal expansión de la compañía en Europa del Este. Él es responsable de diseñar estrategias de marketing y promover el conocimiento de la marca.

Oktay Kavrak

Director

Oktay se incorporó en Laverage Shares a fines de 2019. Él es responsable de impulsar el crecimiento del negocio al mantener relaciones clave y desarrollar la actividad de ventas en los mercados de habla inglesa.

Él vino de UniCredit, donde fue gerente de relaciones corporativas para empresas multinacionales. Su experiencia previa es en finanzas corporativas y administración de fondos en empresas como IBM Bulgaria y DeGiro / FundShare.

Oktay tiene una licenciatura en Finanzas y Contabilidad y un certificado de posgrado en formación empresarial de Babson College. También es titular de una certificado CFA (Chartered Financial Analyst).

Sandeep Rao

Investigación

Sandeep se unió a Leverage Shares en septiembre de 2020. Está a cargo de la investigación de líneas de productos existentes y nuevas, clases de activos y estrategias, con un enfoque particular en el análisis de eventos y desarrollos recientes.

Sandeep tiene una larga experiencia en los mercados financieros. Comenzó en un hedge fund con sede en Chicago como ingeniero financiero, su carrera abarcó varios dominios y organizaciones durante un período de 8 años, desde la División de Prime Services de Barclays Capital hasta (más recientemente) el Equipo Index Research de Nasdaq.

Sandeep tiene una maestría en Finanzas, así como un MBA del Illinois Institute of Technology de Chicago.

Welcome to Leverage Shares

Términos y condiciones

Aviso

Si Vd. no está clasificado como un inversor institucional, será categorizado como un inversor privado / minorista. En este momento, no podemos enviar comunicaciones directamente a inversores privados / minoristas. Le invitamos a ver el contenido de este sitio web y a registrar sus datos para que tengamos un registro para el futuro, sin embargo, no le enviaremos material alguno directamente.

Si Vd. está clasificado «Inversor institucional», Vd. afirma que es un cliente profesional per se, o que desea ser tratado como un cliente profesional electivo, ambas nociones están definidas en la Directiva de los mercados de instrumentos financieros («MiFID»), o un equivalente en una jurisdicción fuera de El Espacio Económico Europeo.

El mantenimiento de esta web corresponde a Leverage Shares Management Company, una sociedad de responsabilidad limitada constituida en Irlanda, cuya sede social se encuentra en 2 Grand Canal Square, Grand Canal Harbour, Dublín 2. El contenido de este sitio web ha sido aprobado bajo el artículo 21 de la ley «Financial Services and Markets Act 2000» por Resolution Compliance Limited. Resolution Compliance Limited está autorizado y regulado por la Financial Conduct Authority (FRN 574048).

Este sitio web se le proporciona únicamente para su información general y no constituye un consejo de inversión, ni una oferta de venta, ni la solicitud de una oferta para comprar inversión alguna.

Nada en este sitio web es un consejo sobre los méritos de producto o inversión alguna, nada constituye un consejo de inversión, legal, fiscal o de otro tipo, ni se debe confiar en él para tomar una decisión de inversión. Los inversores potenciales deben obtener asesoramiento de inversión independiente e informarse sobre los requisitos legales aplicables, las regulaciones de control de cambio y los impuestos en su jurisdicción.

Este sitio web cumple con los requisitos reglamentarios del Reino Unido. Puede haber leyes en su país de nacionalidad o residencia o en el país desde el cual Vd. accede a este sitio wr disponible para Vd.

Visitantes de los Estados Unidos


La información proporcionada en este sitio no está dirigida a ninguna persona de los Estados Unidos ni a ninguna persona en los Estados Unidos, en ninguno de sus Estados o en ninguna de sus territorios o posesiones.

Personas que acceden a este sitio web en el Espacio Económico Europeo


El acceso a este sitio web está limitado a personas que no son estadounidenses fuera de los Estados Unidos en el sentido de la Regulación S bajo la Ley «U.S. Securities Act of 1933», según enmendada (laeb que limiten el grado en el que el sitio web puede esta Ley «Securities Act»). Cada persona que accede a este sitio, al hacerlo, reconoce que: (1) no es una persona de EE. UU. (En el sentido de la Regulación S de la Ley «Securities Act») y se encuentra fuera de los EE. UU. (en el sentido de la Regulación S de la Ley «Securities Act»); y (2) los valores descritos en este documento (A) no están registrados ni lo estarán en virtud de la Ley «Securities Act» o con ninguna autoridad reguladora de valores de cualquier Estado u otra jurisdicción y (B) no se pueden ofrecer, vender, comprometer ni transferir de otra manera excepto a personas fuera de los EE. UU. de conformidad con la Regulación S de la Ley «Securities Act» de conformidad con los términos de dichos valores. Ninguno de los fondos en este sitio web está registrado bajo la Ley estadounidense «Investment Advisers Act of 1940», según enmendada (la Ley «Advisers Act»).


Exclusión de responsabilidad


Ciertos documentos disponibles en el sitio web han sido preparados y emitidos por personas distintas de Leverage Shares Management Company. Esto incluye cualquier documento del Folleto. Leverage Shares Management Company no es responsable de ninguna manera por el contenido de dicho documento. Excepto en esos casos, la información en el sitio web se ha proporcionado de buena fe y se ha hecho todo lo posible para garantizar su precisión. Sin embargo, Leverage Shares Management Company no será responsable de las pérdidas ocasionadas como resultado de la confianza depositada en cualquier parte del sitio web y no garantiza la exactitud de la información o el contenido del sitio web. La descripción de cualquier ETP de Valor a la que se hace referencia en este sitio web es general. Los términos y condiciones aplicables a los inversores se establecerán en el Folleto (disponible en el sitio web) y deben leerse antes de realizar cualquier inversión.


Advertencias de riesgo


El valor de una inversión en ETP puede disminuir o aumentar, y el rendimiento pasado no es un indicador confiable del rendimiento futuro. El comercio de ETP puede no ser adecuado para todos los tipos de inversores, ya que conllevan un alto grado de riesgo. Vd. puede perder toda su inversión inicial. Solo especule con dinero que pueda permitirse perder. Las variaciones en los tipos de cambio también pueden hacer que su inversión suba o baje de valor. Las leyes tributarias pueden estar sujetas a cambios. Asegúrese de comprender completamente los riesgos. Si tiene alguna duda, solicite asesoramiento financiero independiente. Los inversores deben consultar la sección titulada «Factores de riesgo» en el folleto correspondiente para obtener más detalles sobre estos y otros riesgos asociados con una inversión en los valores ofrecidos por el Emisor.


Inversión apalancada


Los productos cotizados en bolsa (ETPs) ofrecen exposición a riesgo apalancada y solo son adecuados para inversores experimentados con conocimiento de los riesgos y beneficios potenciales de las estrategias de inversión apalancadas.

Cookies

Leverage Shares Management Company puede recoger datos sobre su ordenador, incluyendo, cuando esté disponible, su dirección IP, sistema operativo y tipo de navegador, para la administración del sistema y otros fines similares (haga clic aquí para obtener más información). Estos son datos estadísticos sobre las acciones y patrones de navegación de los usuarios, y no identifican a ningún usuario individual del sitio web. Esto se logra mediante el uso de cookies. Una cookie es un pequeño archivo de letras y números que se crea en su ordenador si está Vd. de acuerdo aceptarlo. Al hacer clic en «Acepto» a continuación, Vd. acepta el uso de cookies aquí descrito. Estas cookies le permiten distinguirse de otros usuarios del sitio web, lo que ayuda a Leverage Shares Company a proporcionarle una mejor experiencia cuando navega por el sitio web y también permite que el sitio web esté mejorado de vez en cuando. Tenga en cuenta que puede ajustar la configuración de su navegador para eliminar o bloquear las cookies, pero es posible que no pueda acceder a partes de nuestro sitio web sin ellas.

Al hacer clic, acepta los Términos y condiciones mostrados.