fbpx

Boeing vs Airbus: How The Market Stands Today

Venerable 105-year-old The Boeing Company has been having a tough time lately due in no small part to 21-year-old Airbus SE – the culmination of various historic European aircraft manufacturers who consolidated after the Second World War and with about 25% of its stock held by the governments of France, Germany and Spain. The latter surpassed the former as the world’s largest planemaker by the end of 2019 and is intent on maintaining its lead.

In order to analyze the value propositions inherent, lets break down the scenario on market type: civilian versus military.

Civilian Market

By the end of 2021, Reuters reported that while Airbus had delivered more aircraft than Boeing, the latter had recovered by the end of 2021 in terms of gross orders.

In terms of net orders (gross orders minus cancellations or conversions), Boeing remains a little behind. This metric improves after Boeing adjusts the net orders as per ASC 606 (an accounting mechanism that filters out past orders of aircraft deemed unlikely to be delivered, due to the financial condition of the buyers).

Boeing’s highest production capability remains the problematic 737 – which is also its largest backlog as of end of 2021.

Source: Boeing

Meanwhile, as of end of February, Airbus’ reports on its net total in terms of orders and deliveries indicate prevailing strength.

Source: Airbus

2021 witnessed a massive increase in Airbus’ orders, a slight increase in deliveries and a slight decrease in backlog when compared to 2020. This indicates that the European manufacturer has gone from strength to strength during the pandemic.

Source: Airbus

However, both titans have new rivals that are steadily building competing product offerings. Over the past couple of years, the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (COMAC) – a corporation owned predominantly by the Chinese government – has been working on the C919 which, as of late 2021, has been reported to be ready to commence deliveries later this year, with China Eastern Airlines being its launch customer.

Like most commercial aircraft manufacturers, COMAC is heavily dependent on Western suppliers. It has been reported that up to

60% of its parts come from the likes of Honeywell and General Electric.

Another competitor has been the PJSC United Aircraft Corporation (or «Obyedinyonnaya Aviastroitelnaya Korporatsiya» in its native Russian with the Moscow Stock Exchange ticker UNAC) which is predominantly a conglomerate comprising of the Soviet-era Ilyushin, Irkut, Mikoyan, Sukhoi, Tupolev and Yakovlev design bureaus with a majority stake held by the Russian government. UNAC’s Irkut MC-21 (which is largely similar to the C919 except in the engines) was also expected to take flight this year.

Like the C919, the MC-21 is also dependent on Western suppliers such as Raytheon’s Collins Aerospace and Honeywell. As Russia’s «special military action» in Ukraine continues, most of these suppliers have complied with sanctions and are pulling out of assisting in development of UNAC’s civilian aircraft initiative. This is expected to create significant delays of at least a few years for a large-scale rollout of the MC-21. In June 2016, both UNAC and COMAC initiated a joint venture company named the «China-Russia Aircraft International Co, Ltd.» (CRAIC) in Shanghai with the intention of producing long-range 250- to 320-seat widebody airliners by 2028. Given the problems faced by Russian companies, it’s likely that this timeline will suffer as well.

Military Market

The military market is much more complicated. After the Cold War ended and the Soviet Union dissolved, the military aircraft market is now open to competition from all quarters as opposed to being limited within geopolitical silos. Russian arms manufacturers have found markets in over 45 countries as of 2020.

It’s largest military market, by far, was the Republic of India which has the world’s 2nd largest military and is the 3rd largest military spender. At the time of the Soviet Union’s breakup, over 70% of the country’s army armaments, 80% of its aviation systems and 85% of its naval platforms were of Soviet origin. However, over this past decade, Russia’s share of Indian arms imports fell from 70% in 2012-17 to 46% in 2017-21.

This has primarily been of benefit to manufacturers in France, Israel and the U.S. Boeing benefited enormously too: of the various military products made by the company, the Indian military operates the world’s 2nd largest fleet of P8I submarine hunters after the U.S., 22 Apache helicopter gunships built with India-specific requirements, several Chinook transport helicopters as well as C-17 Globemaster III heavy transport aircraft. But the outlook for future orders looks cloudy on account of an increasing push on foreign manufacturers to either set up base in India by themselves to produce a substantial proportion of the systems being purchased or initiate joint ventures with Indian companies with Indian employees and facilities.

Most of Boeing’s purchased were made under the previous military imports regulations which required an «offset», i.e ,for every weapon system being introduced via a foreign manufacturer, said manufacturer must set up a certain number of localized production-related facilities in India and must select a certain number of system or sub-system suppliers from among India’s high-tech enterprises. However, a key component of U.S. government policy is the leveraging of arms exports to maintain its industrial base and — through economies of scale — reduce costs to the U.S. armed forces. Thus, Boeing has been unable to comply with offsets under the previous law and faces difficulties in maintaining sizeable production work under the current law.

In contrast, Airbus has registered significant success recently: in a deal agreed upon in September 2021, the company secured the sale of 56 C-295 tactical transporters to the Indian military. After a outright import of 16 aircraft in fully-prepared condition, the company will be developing an entire industrial ecosystem – from manufacture, assembly, testing and qualification, to delivery and maintenance over the aircraft’s lifecycle – in a joint venture with its partner Tata Advanced Systems Limited (TASL). The company undoubtedly hopes to leverage this new industrial base to drive future sales of other aircraft and thus deepen market penetration.

In previous years, after a deal for 126 Rafale fighter jets by French company Dassault Aviation was watered down to 36 in «fly-away» condition by the Indian government, the French government – also a key stakeholder in Airbus – pitched a proposal to set up a completely indigenous production facility for manufacturing Rafales if the deal size was pushed up to 100. Additionally, French engine manufacturer Safran offered to modernise and co-develop the indigenous Kaveri engine. After 30 years of intensive work which resulted in nine full prototype engines, four core engines and strong capabilities developed in many critical technology domains, this engine was passed over to meet the changing requirements of the Indian Light Combat Aircraft program – which opted for General Electric engines instead. The French government guaranteed that Safran’s proposal will ensure the republic’s complete ‘sovereignty’ in aero-engine technology. Given how seriously both the Indian government and its billion-plus citizens take the notion of sovereignty, this is a very canny offer and, unsurprisingly, is in the final stages of discussion.

These sorts of innovative decision-making by European players (as well as Israeli companies) indicate why the likes of Boeing and UNAC are finding making inroads into this massive market so challenging. The latter, particularly, has floundered in effectively meeting the Indian government’s stringent requirements in areas such as quality, efficiency and timely delivery when it comes to new orders of next-generation aircraft (as opposed to upgrades and spares for Soviet-era acquisitions).

An order placed with Boeing to acquire six additional P8I aircraft in 2019 was cancelled earlier this year in favour of an indigenous platform based on locally-produced Airbus C-295.

The military market is a very complex place, thus making it difficult to take a call on which company will perform best in weapons sales all over the world. In India’s case, however, Airbus is increasingly stronger in terms of positioning over both Boeing and UNAC.

Ratios and Trends

With regard to fiscals, while the strong net cash position shown in a previous article might suggest that Boeing is in a strong position, this was more due to the fact that the reduction in orders on account of problems with the 737 Max had lowered expenses. This supposition is validated by the Price-to-Earnings (PE) Ratios seen for Boeing making it on par with UNAC. While Boeing’s Price-to-Sales (PS) Ratios led over Airbus for a while, both companies’ PS Ratios are now beginning to draw par. UNAC is a laggard in this metric.

Debt is not a huge concern given the sheer size of these companies. Nonetheless, in this metric, UNAC leads the pack, with Boeing being next (which is predominantly long-term debt). Airbus has also recently been packing on long-term debt as well (which now constitutes around 89% of its total debt).

Source: Bloomberg

Note: Data services don’t report ratios if they’re deemed meaningless. When earnings go negative, PE Ratios estimated go negative. Given that stock price is always positive, this is considered «meaningless».

In the time horizons created between the dates shown above, the stock performance has been quite interesting. UNAC’s stock price had been and remains absurdly low – thus aiding in creating solid average daily traded volumes (in units of shares). Airbus is the least-traded in comparison.

Boeing’s stock performance has shown extremely high variance. This is unsurprising; as highlighted in a previous article regarding the constituents of the S&P 500, the U.S. equity market is the most overvalued in the world. Overvaluation leads to volatility. Airbus comes second here, with UNAC running relatively flat across all the windows.

Between Boeing and Airbus, there is very strong similarity in the extent of variability of stock prices within each horizon, as demonstrated by the coefficient of variation. UNAC has a fairly similar trend as well until Russia’s recent actions in Ukraine pushed up both this metric as well as daily volumes.

Source: Bloomberg

In Conclusion

The mercurial nature of the global military market means that Boeing will likely have to predominantly rely on its domestic legacy business in the U.S. The trend seen in U.S. military aircraft shipments, which started rising after 2001 after a decade of decline, have been downwards since 2010.

Source: Bloomberg

While new orders and shipments have been keeping pace with each other over the past several years, the net value of unfilled orders in the U.S. market continue to balloon upwards.

Source: Bloomberg

The sheer size of «Unfilled Orders» needs some context: while new systems are constantly proposed and even approved, the long timelines for system development vis-à-vis changes in strategic needs and changing technologies means that a large proportion of these orders (by value) will be in limbo until they’re replaced by other orders – after which the cycle repeats. This is, by no means, unique to the U.S.; other nations’ spending show similar trends. However, none are quite as massive as in the U.S. This is an additional factor that highlights the complexity of the military market.

Like UNAC, Boeing has a massive legacy business by virtue of its longevity. Unlike UNAC, it has an element of diversification by virtue of the vast fleets of commercial aircraft already sold, which will inevitably lead to at least some repeat business. The latest development – a China Eastern Airlines Boeing 737-800 taking a near-vertical fall into the Guangxi Hills in southern China – will likely raise many questions of the company’s technical competency, which will possibly get more murky in the upcoming months of investigation and will likely have some impact on the company’s stock performance in the near term.

In the current day, Boeing and Airbus are effectively a duopoly in the civilian market, which is quite meaningful in terms of business. Over the mid- to long-term (i.e. around 5-10 years), an investor shouldn’t be surprised if new rivals emerge: be it COMAC, UNAC or even an Indian company or conglomerate that suddenly announces an entry into this space. Until then, while both companies are viable mid- to long-term investments, Airbus is slightly better positioned than Boeing in terms of nimbleness, market prospects, and perceived technical competence. What this picture will look like in a year’s time is, of course, another matter.

Post correlati

A quick study on the effects of market behaviour on the returns of a 3X ETP vs a 2X ETP.
A quick study on the effects of market behaviour on the returns of a 3X ETP vs a 2X ETP.

Buscar

Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Categories
Education ES
ETPs
featured es
In the press ES
insight ES
Market Insights ES
research ES
Uncategorized
WebsimES
Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Filter by Categories
Education ES
ETPs
featured es
In the press ES
insight ES
Market Insights ES
research ES
Uncategorized
WebsimES

Violeta Todorova

Senior Research

Violeta se unió a Leverage Shares en septiembre de 2022. Ella gestiona la realización de análisis técnicos, investigación macroeconómica y de acciones, y ofrece información valiosa que ayuda a la definición de estrategias de inversión para los clientes.

Antes de unirse a LS, Violeta trabajó en varias empresas de inversión de alto perfil en Australia, como Tollhurst y Morgans Financial, donde pasó los últimos 12 años de su carrera.

Violeta es una técnica de mercado certificada de la Asociación Australiana de Analistas Técnicos y tiene un Diploma de Postgrado en Finanzas e Inversiones Aplicadas de Kaplan Professional (FINSIA), Australia, donde fue profesora durante varios años.

Julian Manoilov

Senior Analyst
Julián se unió a Leverage Shares en 2018 como parte de la principal expansión de la compañía en Europa del Este. Él es responsable de diseñar estrategias de marketing y promover el conocimiento de la marca.

Oktay Kavrak

Director

Oktay se incorporó en Laverage Shares a fines de 2019. Él es responsable de impulsar el crecimiento del negocio al mantener relaciones clave y desarrollar la actividad de ventas en los mercados de habla inglesa.

Él vino de UniCredit, donde fue gerente de relaciones corporativas para empresas multinacionales. Su experiencia previa es en finanzas corporativas y administración de fondos en empresas como IBM Bulgaria y DeGiro / FundShare.

Oktay tiene una licenciatura en Finanzas y Contabilidad y un certificado de posgrado en formación empresarial de Babson College. También es titular de una certificado CFA (Chartered Financial Analyst).

Sandeep Rao

Investigación

Sandeep se unió a Leverage Shares en septiembre de 2020. Está a cargo de la investigación de líneas de productos existentes y nuevas, clases de activos y estrategias, con un enfoque particular en el análisis de eventos y desarrollos recientes.

Sandeep tiene una larga experiencia en los mercados financieros. Comenzó en un hedge fund con sede en Chicago como ingeniero financiero, su carrera abarcó varios dominios y organizaciones durante un período de 8 años, desde la División de Prime Services de Barclays Capital hasta (más recientemente) el Equipo Index Research de Nasdaq.

Sandeep tiene una maestría en Finanzas, así como un MBA del Illinois Institute of Technology de Chicago.

Welcome to Leverage Shares

Términos y condiciones

Aviso

Si Vd. no está clasificado como un inversor institucional, será categorizado como un inversor privado / minorista. En este momento, no podemos enviar comunicaciones directamente a inversores privados / minoristas. Le invitamos a ver el contenido de este sitio web y a registrar sus datos para que tengamos un registro para el futuro, sin embargo, no le enviaremos material alguno directamente.

Si Vd. está clasificado «Inversor institucional», Vd. afirma que es un cliente profesional per se, o que desea ser tratado como un cliente profesional electivo, ambas nociones están definidas en la Directiva de los mercados de instrumentos financieros («MiFID»), o un equivalente en una jurisdicción fuera de El Espacio Económico Europeo.

El mantenimiento de esta web corresponde a Leverage Shares Management Company, una sociedad de responsabilidad limitada constituida en Irlanda, cuya sede social se encuentra en 2 Grand Canal Square, Grand Canal Harbour, Dublín 2. El contenido de este sitio web ha sido aprobado bajo el artículo 21 de la ley «Financial Services and Markets Act 2000» por Resolution Compliance Limited. Resolution Compliance Limited está autorizado y regulado por la Financial Conduct Authority (FRN 574048).

Este sitio web se le proporciona únicamente para su información general y no constituye un consejo de inversión, ni una oferta de venta, ni la solicitud de una oferta para comprar inversión alguna.

Nada en este sitio web es un consejo sobre los méritos de producto o inversión alguna, nada constituye un consejo de inversión, legal, fiscal o de otro tipo, ni se debe confiar en él para tomar una decisión de inversión. Los inversores potenciales deben obtener asesoramiento de inversión independiente e informarse sobre los requisitos legales aplicables, las regulaciones de control de cambio y los impuestos en su jurisdicción.

Este sitio web cumple con los requisitos reglamentarios del Reino Unido. Puede haber leyes en su país de nacionalidad o residencia o en el país desde el cual Vd. accede a este sitio wr disponible para Vd.

Visitantes de los Estados Unidos


La información proporcionada en este sitio no está dirigida a ninguna persona de los Estados Unidos ni a ninguna persona en los Estados Unidos, en ninguno de sus Estados o en ninguna de sus territorios o posesiones.

Personas que acceden a este sitio web en el Espacio Económico Europeo


El acceso a este sitio web está limitado a personas que no son estadounidenses fuera de los Estados Unidos en el sentido de la Regulación S bajo la Ley «U.S. Securities Act of 1933», según enmendada (laeb que limiten el grado en el que el sitio web puede esta Ley «Securities Act»). Cada persona que accede a este sitio, al hacerlo, reconoce que: (1) no es una persona de EE. UU. (En el sentido de la Regulación S de la Ley «Securities Act») y se encuentra fuera de los EE. UU. (en el sentido de la Regulación S de la Ley «Securities Act»); y (2) los valores descritos en este documento (A) no están registrados ni lo estarán en virtud de la Ley «Securities Act» o con ninguna autoridad reguladora de valores de cualquier Estado u otra jurisdicción y (B) no se pueden ofrecer, vender, comprometer ni transferir de otra manera excepto a personas fuera de los EE. UU. de conformidad con la Regulación S de la Ley «Securities Act» de conformidad con los términos de dichos valores. Ninguno de los fondos en este sitio web está registrado bajo la Ley estadounidense «Investment Advisers Act of 1940», según enmendada (la Ley «Advisers Act»).


Exclusión de responsabilidad


Ciertos documentos disponibles en el sitio web han sido preparados y emitidos por personas distintas de Leverage Shares Management Company. Esto incluye cualquier documento del Folleto. Leverage Shares Management Company no es responsable de ninguna manera por el contenido de dicho documento. Excepto en esos casos, la información en el sitio web se ha proporcionado de buena fe y se ha hecho todo lo posible para garantizar su precisión. Sin embargo, Leverage Shares Management Company no será responsable de las pérdidas ocasionadas como resultado de la confianza depositada en cualquier parte del sitio web y no garantiza la exactitud de la información o el contenido del sitio web. La descripción de cualquier ETP de Valor a la que se hace referencia en este sitio web es general. Los términos y condiciones aplicables a los inversores se establecerán en el Folleto (disponible en el sitio web) y deben leerse antes de realizar cualquier inversión.


Advertencias de riesgo


El valor de una inversión en ETP puede disminuir o aumentar, y el rendimiento pasado no es un indicador confiable del rendimiento futuro. El comercio de ETP puede no ser adecuado para todos los tipos de inversores, ya que conllevan un alto grado de riesgo. Vd. puede perder toda su inversión inicial. Solo especule con dinero que pueda permitirse perder. Las variaciones en los tipos de cambio también pueden hacer que su inversión suba o baje de valor. Las leyes tributarias pueden estar sujetas a cambios. Asegúrese de comprender completamente los riesgos. Si tiene alguna duda, solicite asesoramiento financiero independiente. Los inversores deben consultar la sección titulada «Factores de riesgo» en el folleto correspondiente para obtener más detalles sobre estos y otros riesgos asociados con una inversión en los valores ofrecidos por el Emisor.


Inversión apalancada


Los productos cotizados en bolsa (ETPs) ofrecen exposición a riesgo apalancada y solo son adecuados para inversores experimentados con conocimiento de los riesgos y beneficios potenciales de las estrategias de inversión apalancadas.

Cookies

Leverage Shares Management Company puede recoger datos sobre su ordenador, incluyendo, cuando esté disponible, su dirección IP, sistema operativo y tipo de navegador, para la administración del sistema y otros fines similares (haga clic aquí para obtener más información). Estos son datos estadísticos sobre las acciones y patrones de navegación de los usuarios, y no identifican a ningún usuario individual del sitio web. Esto se logra mediante el uso de cookies. Una cookie es un pequeño archivo de letras y números que se crea en su ordenador si está Vd. de acuerdo aceptarlo. Al hacer clic en «Acepto» a continuación, Vd. acepta el uso de cookies aquí descrito. Estas cookies le permiten distinguirse de otros usuarios del sitio web, lo que ayuda a Leverage Shares Company a proporcionarle una mejor experiencia cuando navega por el sitio web y también permite que el sitio web esté mejorado de vez en cuando. Tenga en cuenta que puede ajustar la configuración de su navegador para eliminar o bloquear las cookies, pero es posible que no pueda acceder a partes de nuestro sitio web sin ellas.

Al hacer clic, acepta los Términos y condiciones mostrados.