Your capital is at risk if you invest. You could lose all your investment. Please see the full risk warning here.
The failure of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) – as well as that of Signature Bank and many others seemingly on the brink of collapse – gets attributed to social media-driven fear in the minds of depositors and investors. In other words, some might argue that there is no cause for concern: the financial sector – while not perfect – is quite robust.
In actuality, a vicious cycle of risky business activities interplaying with government actions in recent times exacerbated and laid bare the shaky foundations of the financial services sector. An important key to understanding this is to examine how U.S. government debt issuances are consumed by the financial giants of the world.
Why Treasuries Are Key For Banks’ Market Activity
Ordinarily, banks use cash from customers’ deposits to provide loans to businesses and individuals. The interest payments on these loans ensure that the customers’ deposits used effectively earn a (modest) amount as interest, along with the banks earning a (sometimes substantial) profit as well. Over the course of the pandemic and its associated lockdowns, borrowers wound down borrowing for business purposes while massive disbursements made by the government under various schemes resulted in borrowers often paying down their debts. For instance, commercial real estate developers and car dealerships declined to borrow to expand their businesses while high-interest-rate credit card holders paid their debts off with government stimulus packages. If debts are paid off, there is no interest receivable – which means that there is no cash stream to fund the interest payments on deposits or – for that matter – profits for the banks.
This is when the banks began to buy large chunks of what had lately been the least attractive asset to own: government bonds. After all, a yield that is slightly better than zero at no risk is better than no yield. The Federal Reserve had been inactive on the issue of creeping inflation for years by now and had been propping up the U.S. government’s ever-increasing debt issuances by holding it, thereby effectively acting as a “market maker” of sorts. By all means it sounded like a best choice under the circumstances.
Theoretically, US Treasuries are supposed to be held to maturity wherein the holder gets paid. After all, a Treasury Bond is a loan undertaken by the U.S. government, which pays it off by the end of the specified period. However, the Basel III reforms enacted to regulate banks’ investment activities added another form of utility: non-cash collateral. The Basel III framework demanded that banks set aside even more “additional capital” against the cash they set aside for trading (and risk-taking) than they had before. The rules effectively penalized banks if they were to fund themselves with short-term unsecured deposits to invest in longer-term assets. A cash deposit made in a customer account that can be withdrawn at a moment’s notice therefore cannot necessarily be considered “safe cash” set aside to cover cash used in trading. Banks were required to access high-quality liquid assets (“HQLA”) in a significantly greater volume than before to cushion their investment activities. Naturally, U.S. Treasuries proved to be a beneficiary of this demand.
It wasn’t necessary that only an investment bank would hold U.S. Treasuries; a smaller regional bank could lend U.S. Treasuries from their vault to another party – a large investment bank, for example – for a fee. After all, banks are in the business of making loans. When markets are booming, U.S. Treasuries remained in demand as non-cash collateral all over the world.
Things Take a Turn
When the Federal Reserve couldn’t ignore rising costs hurting citizens any more, it finally began to raise rates – which was arguably long overdue. The U.S. government’s debt issuances, thus, came with a higher yield than the several trillions in debt already in circulation. This began to affect the balance sheets of banks awash in U.S. Treasuries. At the end of 2022, Bank of America held $3 trillion worth of debt securities, which was represented at a value of $862 billion. While accounting rules specify that banks don’t have to record losses due to change in value of these securities unless they were sold, the bank recorded $114 billion as “unrealized losses” for its bond portfolio. Wells Fargo recorded $41 billion; JP Morgan recorded $36 billion and so forth.
It bears remembering that this is an entirely voluntary disclosure. At the time when regulators were seizing Silicon Valley Bank, unrealized losses of $15 billion were estimated on a bond portfolio of just $91 billion. The bank had tangible capital amounting to a total of just $16 billion. Silicon Valley also specialized in “venture debt” wherein the company made unsecured loans on new tech companies and start-ups who also maintained deposits in that bank. When the rate hikes made their debt more expensive, they pulled their deposits. When deposits were pulled, the bank had to liquidate its assets. It started with an attempt to sell a portion of its U.S. Treasury portfolio. After several attempts, the bank managed to sell its bond portfolio with a book value of $23.97 billion at a $1.8 billion loss to Goldman Sachs.
One reason a loss had to be booked when selling U.S. debt is that the market had shrunk to a handful of participants. Chief among them are foreign central banks who buy U.S. debt issuances as policy tools. Given that these issuances guarantee delivery of the U.S. dollar, it could be considered as a proxy of the U.S. dollar to balance the books of trade. However, the highs of the U.S. dollar have created the need for foreign central banks to defend their currencies. The U.S. central bank’s Foreign and International Monetary Authorities (FIMA) repurchase agreement facility, established in March 2020 to enable foreign central banks to post their US Treasury holdings as collateral in exchange for U.S. dollars, recorded the fastest liquidation of U.S. Treasury holdings in nine years after $60 billion in cash was pulled.
Only about 30% of the U.S. government’s debt is held by foreign entities. The rest of it is owned domestically. One such holder is the Federal Reserve itself with over $7 trillion. Recently, it has estimated an unrealized loss of over one trillion dollars.
While U.S. banks have collectively declared over $620 billion in unrealized losses, some recent studies estimate actual unrealized losses for the banks to be at over $1.7 trillion. In other words, the unrealized losses declared are still some way away from the actual picture in the present.
It’s not just U.S. Treasuries that are burgeoning with unrealized losses. Mortgage-backed instruments – where are guaranteed by the U.S. government – are also leading in unrealized losses.
Mortgage loans have seen rising interest rates which, in turn, have had a couple of interesting effects: homeowners with “locked-in” low rates from 2020 or 2021 are unlikely to prepay or refinance while home-buying activity is expected to be grim this year. Since the bank holding the mortgage-backed bond is also “locked-in”, there isn’t enough capital for banks to provide for newly-issued mortgages. This will create significant downward pressure on the mortgage market.
On the commercial mortgage space, frenzied commercial building activity in the U.S. over the past several years might have led to a gross overshooting of demand. The CBRE estimates that roughly 1 in 5 office buildings are currently vacant, with net availability in cubic feet terms being grossly outsized relative to net absorption.
Nearly $30 billion of the approximately $160 billion in commercial real estate loans maturing in 2023 are now past due. A key segment that has provided commercial real estate (CRE) loans is the regional small bank. Unfortunately, this means that the stressors on these banks are far from diminished.
Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse evoked an interesting response from the government: instead of limiting the protection of deposit accounts at $250,000, the U.S. government guaranteed that the entirety of deposits was safeguarded while the bank’s stock and bond holders were left high and dry. This is entirely different from the level of protection accorded to big banks, which are deemed Systematically Important Banks (SIBs) and indicative of a two-tier system in place where there should be none. Nonetheless, the divergence in the rescue operation for depositors at SVB evokes hope that similar protection would be extended to other small banks despite the fact that the U.S. Treasury Secretary has remained non-committal in stating so outright. An omission of statement is a cause for stress in the lower end of the spectrum of banks that comprise the financial services sector. This also imparts a survivability bias towards the SIBs and those closest to them than the rest.
While sky-high U.S. dollar valuations continue to trigger Treasury selloffs from foreign central banks and a downward pressure on U.S. debt valuations, they also create lower depositary balances as rising costs eat into savings. This, in turn, will continue to trigger further rate hikes and continue to lower valuations of past U.S. debt issuances. This is yet another vicious cycle at play in this sector. For the two vicious cycles to end, there has to be further reformation of banking activities as well as a string of indicators signifying a sustained climb-down of both the U.S. dollar as well as living costs. At this current juncture, it is impossible to predict this happening any time this year with certainty. A close eye is merited on events and indicators as they transpire and update respectively.
For investors, tactical bets on some of the key players in the sector exposure might work out to be an interesting strategy to explore, given that this sector will continue to bear witness to volatility. For instance, sophisticated investors can consider ETP plays on both the upside and downside for JPMorgan, Citi and Goldman Sachs. A larger sector-wide play can be considered on the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) – which is a market cap-weighted benchmark for the entire U.S. financial sector. ETPs are available for both the upside as well as the downside of this play.
Your capital is at risk if you invest. You could lose all your investment. Please see the full risk warning here.
Sandeep joined Leverage Shares in September 2020. He leads research on existing and new product lines, asset classes, and strategies, with special emphasis on analysis of recent events and developments.
Sandeep has longstanding experience with financial markets. Starting with a Chicago-based hedge fund as a financial engineer, his career has spanned a variety of domains and organizations over a course of 8 years – from Barclays Capital’s Prime Services Division to (most recently) Nasdaq’s Index Research Team.
Sandeep holds an M.S. in Finance as well as an MBA from Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago.
Violeta joined Leverage Shares in September 2022. She is responsible for conducting technical analysis, macro and equity research, providing valuable insights to help shape investment strategies for clients.
Prior to joining LS, Violeta worked at several high-profile investment firms in Australia, such as Tollhurst and Morgans Financial where she spent the past 12 years of her career.
Violeta is a certified market technician from the Australian Technical Analysts Association and holds a Post Graduate Diploma of Applied Finance and Investment from Kaplan Professional (FINSIA), Australia, where she was a lecturer for a number of years.
Julian joined Leverage Shares in 2018 as part of the company’s premier expansion in Eastern Europe. He is responsible for web content and raising brand awareness.
Julian has been academically involved with economics, psychology, sociology, European politics & linguistics. He has experience in business development and marketing through business ventures of his own.
For Julian, Leverage Shares is an innovator in the field of finance & fintech, and he always looks forward with excitement to share the next big news with investors in the UK & Europe.
Oktay joined Leverage Shares in late 2019. He is responsible for driving business growth by maintaining key relationships and developing sales activity across English-speaking markets.
He joined LS from UniCredit, where he was a corporate relationship manager for multinationals. His previous experience is in corporate finance and fund administration at firms like IBM Bulgaria and DeGiro / FundShare.
Oktay holds a BA in Finance & Accounting and a post-graduate certificate in Entrepreneurship from Babson College. He is also a CFA charterholder.
Terms and Conditions
If you are not classified as an institutional investor, you will be categorised as a private/retail investor. At this time, we cannot send communications directly to private/retail investors. You are welcome to view the contents of this website.
If you are an ‘Institutional investor’, you affirm either that you are a Per Se Professional Client, or that you wish to be treated as an Eligible Counterparty Client, both as defined under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, or an equivalent in a jurisdiction outside the European Economic Area.
The value of an investment in ETPs may go down as well as up and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Trading in ETPs may not be suitable for all types of investor as they carry a high degree of risk. You may lose all of your initial investment. Only speculate with money you can afford to lose. Changes in exchange rates may also cause your investment to go up or down in value. Tax laws may be subject to change. Please ensure that you fully understand the risks involved. If in any doubt, please seek independent financial advice. Investors should refer to the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the relevant prospectus for further details of these and other risks associated with an investment in the securities offered by the Issuer.
This website is provided for your general information only and does not constitute investment advice or an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any investment.
Nothing on this website is advice on the merits of any product or investment, nothing constitutes investment, legal, tax or any other advice nor is it to be relied on in making an investment decision. Prospective investors should obtain independent investment advice and inform themselves as to applicable legal requirements, exchange control regulations and taxes in their jurisdiction.
This website complies with the regulatory requirements of the United Kingdom. There may be laws in your country of nationality or residence or in the country from which you access this website which restrict the extent to which the website may be made available to you.
United States Visitors
The information provided on this site is not directed to any United States person or any person in the United States, any state thereof, or any of its territories or possessions.
Persons accessing this website in the European Economic Area
Access to this site is restricted to Non-U.S. Persons outside the United States within the meaning of Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Each person accessing this site, by so doing, acknowledges that: (1) it is not a U.S. person (within the meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act) and is located outside the U.S. (within the meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act); and (2) any securities described herein (A) have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act or with any securities regulatory authority of any state or other jurisdiction and (B) may not be offered, sold, pledged or otherwise transferred except to persons outside the U.S. in accordance with Regulation S under the Securities Act pursuant to the terms of such securities. None of the funds on this website are registered under the United States Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”).
Exclusion of Liability
Certain documents made available on the website have been prepared and issued by persons other than Leverage Shares Management Company. This includes any Prospectus document. Leverage Shares Management Company is not responsible in any way for the content of any such document. Except in those cases, the information on the website has been given in good faith and every effort has been made to ensure its accuracy. Nevertheless, Leverage Shares Management Company shall not be responsible for loss occasioned as a result of reliance placed on any part of the website and it makes no guarantee as to the accuracy of any information or content on the website. The description of any ETP Security referred to in this website is a general one. The terms and conditions applicable to investors will be set out in the Prospectus, available on the website and should be read prior to making any investment.
Leverage Shares exchange-traded products (ETPs) provide leveraged exposure and are only suitable for experienced investors with knowledge of the risks and potential benefits of leveraged investment strategies.
This website is maintained by Leverage Shares Management Company, which is a limited liability company and is incorporated in Ireland with registered offices at 2 Grand Canal Square, Grand Canal Harbour, Dublin 2.
By clicking you agree to the Terms and Conditions displayed.